<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Boise Multiple Listings - Chuck Jones</title>
	<atom:link href="http://chuckjones.visualwebb.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://chuckjones.visualwebb.com</link>
	<description>We answer our phones, return our messages, and deliver top notch service.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 04:03:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Boise Metro Total Distressed Inventory</title>
		<link>http://chuckjones.visualwebb.com/2012/04/17/boise-metro-total-distressed-inventory/</link>
		<comments>http://chuckjones.visualwebb.com/2012/04/17/boise-metro-total-distressed-inventory/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 03:47:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chuck</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chuckjones.visualwebb.com/?p=275</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Six states continue to hold over 50% of all shadow inventory, which include: Florida, California, Illinois, New York, Texas and New Jersey.  Current levels are 4 times higher than the peak of the housing in summer of 2006. The highest concentration of shadow inventory is for loans with loan balances between $100,000 and $125,000, see [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://frontstreetbrokers.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/Boise-id-foreclosures.png"><img src="http://frontstreetbrokers.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/Boise-id-foreclosures.png" alt="Boise id foreclosures Foreclosure Report | Shadow Inventory" width="560" height="316" border="0" /></a></p>
<p>Six states continue to hold over 50% of all shadow inventory, which include:</p>
<p>Florida, California, Illinois, New York, Texas and New Jersey.  Current levels are 4 times higher than the peak of the housing in summer of 2006.</p>
<p>The highest concentration of shadow inventory is for loans with loan balances between $100,000 and $125,000, see chart.</p>
<p><a href="http://frontstreetbrokers.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/Shadow-Inventory.png"><img src="http://frontstreetbrokers.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/Shadow-Inventory.png" alt="Shadow Inventory Foreclosure Report | Shadow Inventory" width="560" height="340" border="0" /></a></p>
<p>In Boise, ID, year to date over 50% of home sales have been priced below $160,000.  However, available inventory priced below $160,000 in Boise is more than 50% less than it was last year at this time, sitting at 2.5 months of inventory.  These kinds of stats have to lead to a higher median price for the area, especially since foreclosures are declining so quickly.</p>
<p>Therefore, it is my professional opinion that home prices in the Boise ID region will increase significantly in 2012, as they are leading the rest of nation in the recovery by at least 18 months.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://chuckjones.visualwebb.com/2012/04/17/boise-metro-total-distressed-inventory/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Real Estate Outlook: Job Growth and Builder Confidence</title>
		<link>http://chuckjones.visualwebb.com/2012/03/20/real-estate-outlook-job-growth-and-builder-confidence/</link>
		<comments>http://chuckjones.visualwebb.com/2012/03/20/real-estate-outlook-job-growth-and-builder-confidence/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2012 16:14:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chuck</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chuckjones.visualwebb.com/?p=270</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Real Estate Outlook: Job Growth and Builder Confidence by Carla Hill &#160; The latest monthly report from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics shows that the unemployment rate is still on its way down. This is good news for job seekers and home sellers alike.The current unemployment rate is now at 8.3 percent. Last year [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Real Estate Outlook: Job Growth and Builder Confidence</div>
<div>by Carla Hill</div>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<div>The latest monthly report from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics shows that the unemployment rate is still on its way down. This is good news for job seekers and home sellers alike.The current unemployment rate is now at 8.3 percent. Last year the annual average was 8.9 percent, with nearly 14 million unemployed. February saw an increase of 428,000 employed, movement in a positive direction.</p>
<p>Will these newly employed be entering the housing market? We&#8217;ve heard it said over and over again over the last year that affordability rates are at historic highs.</p>
<p>This means more Americans today are able to afford buying a home than ever before. Does this mean more buyers for you home?</p>
<p>The latest Census Bureau&#8217;s American Community Survey indicates that while many Americans can now afford to buy, the price range they can afford may be much lower than some sellers had hoped for.</p>
<p>According to the National Association of Home Builders (NAHB) it takes around $26,430 of annual income to afford a $100,000 home. &#8220;In 2012, about 28.9 million households in the U.S. are estimated to have incomes lower than that threshold and, therefore, can only afford to buy homes priced under $100,000,&#8221; they reported. &#8220;These 28.9 million households form the bottom step of the pyramid. Of the remaining 87.5 million who can afford a home priced at $100,000, 23.3 million can only afford to pay a top price of somewhere between $100,000 and $175,000 (the second step on the pyramid).&#8221;</p>
<p>The higher the prices go, the smaller the pool of buyers. For many states and towns these average prices are much lower than their area median.</p>
<p>The Department of Commerce&#8217;s Census Bureau, both homeownership and rental vacancy rates are practically the same as they were in 2010. Does this mean buyers, even at lower income levels, are taking advantage of today&#8217;s affordable rates and prices?</p>
<p>National vacancy rates in the fourth quarter 2011 were 9.4 percent for rental housing and 2.3 percent for homeowner housing.</p>
<p>Among regions, the rental vacancy rate was highest in the South (12.0 percent) and lowest in the West (6.6 percent). The rental vacancy rate in the West was lower than in the fourth quarter 2010, while the rates in the Northeast, Midwest, and South were statistically unchanged.</p>
<p>Builders are building confidence in the multi-family housing market. The NAHB reports that the Multi-Family Production Index rose to the highest level seen since 2005.</p>
<p>Looking forward to the next six months, builder and developer expectations improved in the fourth quarter for all three components: low-rent units, market-rate rental units, and for-sale properties.</p>
<p>&#8220;The apartment and condo sector continues to be a bright spot in the housing market, with the overall index at its highest level in six years,&#8221; said NAHB Chief Economist David Crowe. &#8220;The rental components have been the driving force behind the increased index level. And although the for-sale component remains weaker, it is still double what it was just six quarters ago.&#8221;</p>
<p>This is good news since historical trends show that when these indices perform well, we&#8217;re likely to see movement in Census figure one to three quarters in advance.</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://chuckjones.visualwebb.com/2012/03/20/real-estate-outlook-job-growth-and-builder-confidence/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bank of America pays Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac $2.6 Billion</title>
		<link>http://chuckjones.visualwebb.com/2012/02/24/bank-of-america-pays-fannie-mae-and-freddie-mac-2-6-billion/</link>
		<comments>http://chuckjones.visualwebb.com/2012/02/24/bank-of-america-pays-fannie-mae-and-freddie-mac-2-6-billion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2012 22:00:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chuck</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chuckjones.visualwebb.com/?p=261</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bank of America this week announced it is severely cutting back sales of loans to Fannie Mae. The move is part of Bank of America&#8217;s (BAC) ongoing efforts to undo the damage of its ill-fated acquisition of Countrywide Financial in 2008, but could have broader implications if other big banks follow suit. To date, Bank [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bank of America this week announced it is severely cutting back sales of<br />
loans to Fannie Mae. The move is part of Bank of America&#8217;s (<a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=BAC&amp;ql=1">BAC</a>) ongoing efforts to<br />
undo the damage of its ill-fated acquisition of Countrywide Financial in 2008,<br />
but could have broader implications if other big banks follow suit.</p>
<p>To date, Bank of America has paid Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac $2.6 billion to<br />
settle demands from the GSEs that the bank buy back mortgages that have gone<br />
sour, or were wrongly underwritten. Bank of America cited &#8220;ongoing<br />
differences&#8221; with Fannie Mae over these repurchase claims as a rationale<br />
for severely curtailing its dealings with Fannie. In December, the bank<br />
underwrote just $3.5 billion of loans backed by Fannie, Freddie or Ginnie Mae<br />
vs. $21.9 billion in December 2010, <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970203960804577241741791751590.html?mod=WSJ_hp_LEFTWhatsNewsCollection">The<br />
WSJ reports</a>.</p>
<p>The practical implications of this decision is it will be harder for<br />
consumers to get a home loan from Bank of America, which has already stopped<br />
buying loans from third-party mortgage lenders. Citigroup is moving in the same<br />
direction, according to a source in the mortgage industry. While other banks &#8211;<br />
like Wells Fargo (<a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=WFC&amp;reco=1">WFC</a>),<br />
Sun Trust (<a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=STI&amp;ql=1">STI</a>),<br />
BB&amp;T (<a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=BBT&amp;reco=1">BBT</a>) and US<br />
Bancorp (<a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=USB&amp;reco=1">USB</a>)&#8211; are<br />
stepping into the void, the decisions by BofA and Citi (<a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=C&amp;ql=1">C</a>) are exacerbating the<br />
problems many Americans are having trying to secure a loan, even those with<br />
good credit scores and money for down payments. (<strong>See: </strong><a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/blogs/daily-ticker/getting-mortgage-shouldn-t-hard-housing-finance-gets-135055314.html">Getting<br />
a Mortgage Shouldn&#8217;t Be This Hard: Housing Finance Gets &#8216;Taken to Task&#8217;</a>)</p>
<p><strong>In Search of&#8230;Life Beyond Fannie &amp; Freddie</strong></p>
<p>By ending its activity in the so-called correspondent lending channel, Bank<br />
of America is effectively saying it will only underwrite mortgages that are<br />
originated in house. By stopping the sale of most loans to Fannie, the bank<br />
will either be forced to hold those loans in its portfolio or seek an<br />
alternative buyer.</p>
<p>Since 2008, the private secondary market for mortgage loans has effectively<br />
dried up. Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, FHA and other government-sponsored<br />
enterprises back more than 90% of all home loans originated since the crisis.</p>
<p>Earlier this month, Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner laid out a plan to<br />
significantly reduce the government&#8217;s role in the mortgage market, based on<br />
three options, as <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/02/12/business/12housing.html?_r=1&#038;hp=&amp;">The<br />
NY Times reports</a>:</p>
<ul>
<li>Eliminate any government<br />
guarantee for middle-class mortgages.</li>
<li>The government would only<br />
back loans during times of financial distress.</li>
<li>The government still would<br />
only guarantee mortgages if lenders first purchase a guarantee from a<br />
private insurer.</li>
</ul>
<p>Bank of America&#8217;s decision to stop selling loans to Fannie<br />
appears to be the case of one firm being fed up dealing with Uncle Sam&#8217;s<br />
minions and the story may end here. Still, BofA may have unwittingly opened the<br />
window to a fourth, private-sector solution.</p>
<p>If Bank of America is able to successfully originate loans and find a<br />
private secondary market to sell them into, other banks may want of a piece of<br />
the action too. Private firms like Goldman Sachs (<a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=gs&amp;ql=1">GS</a>), as well as hedge fund<br />
and private equity investors might be interested in creating an alternative<br />
secondary market, if the price is right, of course. This could take years to<br />
develop, if it ever gets off the ground, but Geithner put a 5-to-7 year<br />
timetable on his exit plan so there is plenty of time for the private market to<br />
test the economics of such a scenario.</p>
<p>Ultimately, a private-based secondary market will almost certainly mean<br />
higher fees and higher mortgage rates for consumers, and banks will almost<br />
certainly continue to tighten lending standards in the hypothetical post-Fannie<br />
era. Many will argue that&#8217;ll be money well spent if we can really kick the GSE<br />
habit.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s a price to be paid for unwinding the<br />
current system and, one way or another, U.S. taxpayers &#8212; the ones who bailed<br />
out the big banks and are still on the hook for Fannie and Freddie &#8212; will<br />
almost certainly end up with the bill.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://chuckjones.visualwebb.com/2012/02/24/bank-of-america-pays-fannie-mae-and-freddie-mac-2-6-billion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Idaho’s Foreclosure Rate Posts Dramatic Drop Over Last Year</title>
		<link>http://chuckjones.visualwebb.com/2012/02/24/idaho%e2%80%99s-foreclosure-rate-posts-dramatic-drop-over-last-year/</link>
		<comments>http://chuckjones.visualwebb.com/2012/02/24/idaho%e2%80%99s-foreclosure-rate-posts-dramatic-drop-over-last-year/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2012 21:07:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chuck</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chuckjones.visualwebb.com/?p=258</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[RealtyTrac Click on the image above to use RealtyTrac’s interactive map. Idaho’s foreclosure rate ticked up slightly in January, by about 6 percent.  That’s according to new numbers from RealtyTrac, which analyzes housing and foreclosure data. That said, the current rate represents a dramatic 68 percent decrease from January of 2011.  Moreover, Idaho’s foreclosure rate [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><a href="http://www.realtytrac.com/content/foreclosure-market-report/january-2012-us-foreclosure-market-report-7022"><img src="http://stateimpact.npr.org/idaho/files/2012/02/2-16-Foreclosure-Numbers-300x218.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="218" /></a>RealtyTrac</p>
<p>Click on the image above to use RealtyTrac’s interactive map.</p>
</div>
<p>Idaho’s foreclosure rate ticked up slightly in January, by about 6 percent.  That’s according to <a href="http://www.realtytrac.com/content/foreclosure-market-report/january-2012-us-foreclosure-market-report-7022" target="_blank">new numbers from RealtyTrac</a>, which analyzes housing and foreclosure data.</p>
<p>That said, the <a href="http://www.realtytrac.com/trendcenter/id-trend.html" target="_blank">current rate</a> represents a dramatic 68 percent decrease from January of 2011.  Moreover, Idaho’s foreclosure rate has now fallen to 16th in the nation, after remaining in the top ten for much of last year.</p>
<p>Nationally, the foreclosure rate ticked up by 3 percent from December to January, leading RealtyTrac CEO Brandon Moore to say there are signs “the frozen-up foreclosure process is beginning to thaw.”  That’s in the wake of last week’s <a title="Where Idaho Borrowers Stand in Today’s Mortgage Settlement" href="http://stateimpact.npr.org/idaho/2012/02/09/where-idaho-borrowers-stand-in-todays-mortgage-settlement/" target="_blank">$26 billion mortgage settlement</a> between government officials and five of the nation’s largest banks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://chuckjones.visualwebb.com/2012/02/24/idaho%e2%80%99s-foreclosure-rate-posts-dramatic-drop-over-last-year/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Where the Jobs Are (and Aren&#8217;t) in Idaho</title>
		<link>http://chuckjones.visualwebb.com/2012/02/24/where-the-jobs-are-and-arent-in-idaho/</link>
		<comments>http://chuckjones.visualwebb.com/2012/02/24/where-the-jobs-are-and-arent-in-idaho/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2012 21:05:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chuck</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chuckjones.visualwebb.com/?p=256</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The big employers in Idaho just keep getting bigger. Most of the top companies and government agencies five years ago have managed to either retain or expand their workforce, according to a new StateImpact analysis of data provided by the Idaho Department of Labor. St. Luke’s Health Systems saw the largest growth, with its workforce [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The big employers in Idaho just keep getting bigger.</p>
<p>Most of the top companies and government agencies five years ago have managed to either retain or expand their workforce, according to a new <em>StateImpact</em> analysis of data provided by the Idaho Department of Labor.</p>
<p>St. Luke’s Health Systems saw the largest growth, with its workforce of between 4,000 and 5,000 employees in 2005 increasing by about 4,000 by the end of fiscal year 2011.</p>
<p>That’s not to say there aren’t plenty of businesses and government agencies that cut jobs during that same time period. The biggest loser was Boise-based Micron Technology, which reduced its workforce by between 3,500 and 5,000. Albertsons/Supervalu, Hewlett-Packard and Potlatch Forest Products Corp also reduced their workforces.</p>
<table summary="Google Spreadsheet">
<col />
<col />
<col />
<col />
<thead>
<tr>
<th>
<div>2011 Rank</div>
</th>
<th>
<div>Employer</div>
</th>
<th>
<div>2011 workforce</div>
</th>
<th>
<div>2005 workforce</div>
</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>1</td>
<td>St Lukes Health Systems</td>
<td>8,000 — 9,000</td>
<td>4,000 — 5,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2</td>
<td>Wal-Mart</td>
<td>6,000 — 7,000</td>
<td>6,000 — 7,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>3</td>
<td>Micron Technology</td>
<td>5,000 — 5,500</td>
<td>9,000 — 10,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>4</td>
<td>University of Idaho</td>
<td>4,000 — 5,000</td>
<td>4,000 — 5,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>5</td>
<td>Meridian Joint School District #2</td>
<td>4,000 — 5,000</td>
<td>3,000 — 4,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>6</td>
<td>Battelle Energy Alliance</td>
<td>4,000 — 5,000</td>
<td>3,000 — 4,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>7</td>
<td>Boise State University</td>
<td>4,000 — 5,000</td>
<td>3,000 — 4,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>8</td>
<td>Brigham Young University Idaho</td>
<td>4,000 — 5,000</td>
<td>3,000 — 4,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>9</td>
<td>Boise Independent School District #1</td>
<td>3,000 — 4,000</td>
<td>3,000 — 4,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>10</td>
<td>Albertsons / Supervalu</td>
<td>3,000 — 4,000</td>
<td>5,000 — 6,000</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Source: Idaho Department of Labor</p>
<p>The Idaho Department of  Health and Welfare, the fourteenth largest employer in the state, also saw it’s <a title="Nearly 1,000 Idaho State Employees Laid-Off Since 2007" href="http://stateimpact.npr.org/idaho/2012/01/12/nearly-1000-idaho-state-workers-laid-off-since-2007/" target="_blank">workforce dwindle</a> in spite of a growing caseload. The Department administers food stamp, child welfare and Medicaid programs, among other social services and is currently <a href="http://legislature.idaho.gov/budget/JFAC/presentations/index.htm" target="_blank">making their case</a> before the legislative budget committee to retain or increase their current staffing levels. We’ve made a sortable spreadsheet of Idaho’s top 30-plus employers–including the number of employees they have in Idaho–going back to 2005 <a title="Idaho's Top Statewide Employers" href="https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/pub?hl=en_US&amp;hl=en_US&amp;key=0AoRcHDQqbLhbdFZFVTk3ZHcwRnlyTXhsMzZxUDZzdlE&amp;single=true&amp;gid=0&amp;output=html" target="_blank">here</a>.</p>
<p>Idaho state employees don’t appear in one big chunk in the data, as each state agency is required to file their numbers separately. However, if taken as one entity, the state would finish well ahead of other employers in the state, with about 24,400 employees at the start of this calendar year, according the state <a href="http://www.sco.idaho.gov/web/scoweb.nsf/pages/2012LegHndbk.htm/$File/2012LegislativeHandbook.pdf?OpenElement" target="_blank">controller’s office</a>. That figure has decreased just slightly since 2005, and doesn’t include local, county or school district employees.</p>
<p>Employment data is reported to the state in ranges in order to reflect any changes that may have occurred over the year. It is calculated according to the federal fiscal calendar, which runs from September through October.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://chuckjones.visualwebb.com/2012/02/24/where-the-jobs-are-and-arent-in-idaho/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Holiday Spending Without an Extra Cent</title>
		<link>http://chuckjones.visualwebb.com/2011/12/05/holiday-spending-without-an-extra-cent-2/</link>
		<comments>http://chuckjones.visualwebb.com/2011/12/05/holiday-spending-without-an-extra-cent-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 15:38:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chuck</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chuckjones.visualwebb.com/?p=242</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Time is a precious commodity, but it&#8217;s even more treasured because it is fleeting. As soon as a day, an hour, or even a minute passes, it is gone forever. While that might be stating the obvious, it&#8217;s an important concept to reflect on during the often-hectic holiday season. So this holiday season &#8211; regardless [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Time is a precious commodity, but it&#8217;s even more treasured because it is<br />
fleeting. As soon as a day, an hour, or even a minute passes, it is gone<br />
forever.</p>
<p>While that might be stating the obvious, it&#8217;s an important concept to reflect<br />
on during the often-hectic holiday season. So this holiday season &#8211; regardless<br />
of which holiday you celebrate or if you celebrate any &#8211; remember to focus on<br />
and spend time with the people around you, including family, friends, and even<br />
coworkers or clients.</p>
<p>When TV personality and kid expert Art Linkletter was asked about the idea of<br />
spending time with loved ones this is what he said:</p>
<p>&#8220;I once asked a five-year-old what he would take with him if he were going to<br />
Heaven. He replied, &#8216;I would take my parents because I think that up there they<br />
would have more time with me&#8217;&#8230; nuff said.&#8221;</p>
<p>The good news is, it&#8217;s actually possible to slow time down in a way that<br />
seems to lengthen special events like a day of fishing with your child or a<br />
special dinner with a good friend. The key is to consciously honor the person<br />
and the event as you experience it. To be in the moment.</p>
<p>In the days and weeks ahead, remember to recognize the people you care about.<br />
You don&#8217;t need to do or say anything specific, nor do you need to spend any<br />
money. You simply need to spend time with them. So consider setting aside two<br />
hours one day for coffee with a friend. Or if you have children, make special<br />
plans to take each one out individually for their own dinner. You can even set<br />
aside a short amount of time each day to call some of your special clients to<br />
see how they&#8217;re doing and personally wish them a happy holiday. And when you do,<br />
avoid distractions like technology or worries about what else you need to do<br />
that day.</p>
<p>After all, once the moment passes, you can go back to that checklist of<br />
things to do. But you can never go back to that moment in time.</p>
<p>Economic Calendar for the Week of December 05 &#8211; December<br />
09</p>
<table width="700" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" bgcolor="#000000">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
<table width="100%" border="0" cellspacing="2" cellpadding="3">
<tbody>
<tr bgcolor="#00ccff">
<td>
<div align="center">Date</div>
</td>
<td>
<div align="center">ET</div>
</td>
<td>
<div align="center">Economic Report</div>
</td>
<td>
<div align="center">For</div>
</td>
<td>
<div align="center">Estimate</div>
</td>
<td>
<div align="center">Actual</div>
</td>
<td>
<div align="center">Prior</div>
</td>
<td>
<div align="center">Impact</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr bgcolor="#ffff99">
<td bgcolor="#ffff99" width="120">Mon. December 05</td>
<td bgcolor="#ffff99">
<div align="center">10:00</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#ffff99">ISM Services Index</td>
<td bgcolor="#ffff99">
<div align="center">Nov</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#ffff99">
<div align="center">53.4</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#ffff99"></td>
<td bgcolor="#ffff99" width="50">
<div align="center">52.9</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#ffff99">
<div align="center">Moderate</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr bgcolor="#66ff99">
<td bgcolor="#66ff99" width="120">Thu. December 08</td>
<td bgcolor="#66ff99">
<div align="center">08:30</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#66ff99">Jobless Claims (Initial)</td>
<td bgcolor="#66ff99">
<div align="center">12/3</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#66ff99">
<div align="center">395K</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#66ff99"></td>
<td bgcolor="#66ff99" width="50">
<div align="center">402K</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#66ff99">
<div align="center">Moderate</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr bgcolor="#ffff99">
<td bgcolor="#ffff99" width="120">Fri. December 09</td>
<td bgcolor="#ffff99">
<div align="center">10:00</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#ffff99">Consumer Sentiment Index (UoM)</td>
<td bgcolor="#ffff99">
<div align="center">Dec</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#ffff99">
<div align="center">65.0</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#ffff99"></td>
<td bgcolor="#ffff99" width="50">
<div align="center">64.1</div>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#ffff99">
<div align="center">Moderate</div>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://chuckjones.visualwebb.com/2011/12/05/holiday-spending-without-an-extra-cent-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Slow and Steady Wins!</title>
		<link>http://chuckjones.visualwebb.com/2011/12/05/slow-and-steady-wins/</link>
		<comments>http://chuckjones.visualwebb.com/2011/12/05/slow-and-steady-wins/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 15:35:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chuck</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chuckjones.visualwebb.com/?p=239</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s been said that &#8220;slow and steady wins the race.&#8221; And when it comes to the Jobs Report for November, it seems that the labor market continues to improve at a gradual pace. Read on for the details&#8230;and what they mean for home loan rates. There was good news, as the headline number for job [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>It&#8217;s been said that &#8220;slow and steady wins the race.&#8221; </strong>And<br />
when it comes to the Jobs Report for November, it seems that the labor market<br />
continues to improve at a gradual pace. Read on for the details&#8230;and what they<br />
mean for home loan rates.</p>
<p><img src="http://www.mmgweekly.com/templates/mmgweekly/reg_chart/332/images/topimage.gif" alt="" align="left" hspace="5" /><br />
There was good news, as the headline number for job creations in November came<br />
in at 120,000, with 140,000 private jobs offsetting government losses. What&#8217;s<br />
more, some upward revisions to the two previous readings added 72,000 more jobs<br />
than had been reported.</p>
<p>Perhaps even more important, Hourly Earnings grew by just 0.1% &#8211; a number<br />
that suggests no threat of wage-based inflation. Remember, inflation is the arch<br />
enemy of Bonds and home loan rates because when inflation rises, investors in<br />
Bonds demand a higher yield to offset the lost buying power inflation imposes on<br />
a fixed payment. And as home loan rates are tied to Mortgage Bonds, this would<br />
mean home loan rates move higher. So the Hourly Earnings number was good news<br />
for Bonds and home loan rates.</p>
<p>Catching the markets by surprise was a rather sharp decline in the<br />
unemployment rate to 8.6%, the lowest unemployment rate we&#8217;ve since March of<br />
2009. While this is good news on the one hand, part of the decline stems from<br />
the fact that 315,000 people were removed from the workforce because they<br />
totally gave up looking for work. And with 13.3 million Americans still out of<br />
work, more improvement is certainly needed here.</p>
<p>Similarly, the labor participation rate (which is currently hovering at a<br />
30-year low at 64) needs to move above 66 or it will be difficult for the<br />
economy to grow fast enough to lower our budget deficit. In fact, last week Bond<br />
ratings firm Fitch issued a stern warning to the US, saying that our AAA rating<br />
will be in jeopardy if we don&#8217;t soon do something to rein in our own<br />
ever-growing budget deficit.</p>
<p><strong><em>It is good news that we&#8217;re seeing some slow and steady improvement in<br />
the labor market…and coupling this with other recent positive economic signals,<br />
means we are not near a recession at the moment. </em></strong>But our economic health<br />
remains fragile, and any external shock from Europe could easily disrupt the<br />
economic improvement we are seeing.</p>
<p>The bottom line is that the uncertainty out of Europe &#8211; and the prospect of<br />
additional Mortgage Bond buying (QE3) from the Fed &#8211; should continue to support<br />
Bonds and home loan rates as they will benefit from investors looking for a safe<br />
haven for their money. However, it is also unlikely that Bonds and home loan<br />
rates will improve much further. Inflation, while not yet a problem, is still<br />
elevated…and if it continues to creep higher, this will limit any improvement<br />
home loan rates may see.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://chuckjones.visualwebb.com/2011/12/05/slow-and-steady-wins/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Better Mortgage Rates Start With Better FICO Scores</title>
		<link>http://chuckjones.visualwebb.com/2011/10/31/better-mortgage-rates-start-with-better-fico-scores/</link>
		<comments>http://chuckjones.visualwebb.com/2011/10/31/better-mortgage-rates-start-with-better-fico-scores/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2011 20:44:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chuck</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chuckjones.visualwebb.com/?p=218</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you plan to use a mortgage for your next home purchase, you’ll want to keep your credit scores as high as possible. Credit scores play an out-sized role in determining for which mortgage product you’ll qualify, and to which rate you’ll be assigned by your lender.The higher your credit score, the lower your mortgage [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
<div>
<h1><a href="http://pro.truliablog.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/llpa-upcharges-fico.png"><img src="http://pro.truliablog.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/llpa-upcharges-fico.png" alt="Credit scores change mortgage rates" width="600" height="360" /></a></h1>
</div>
<h1></h1>
<p>If you plan to use a mortgage for your next home purchase, you’ll want to keep your credit scores as high as possible. Credit scores play an out-sized role in determining for which mortgage product you’ll qualify, and to which rate you’ll be assigned by your lender.The higher your credit score, the lower your mortgage rate will be.</p>
<h1>
<article>What Is A Credit Score?</p>
</article>
</h1>
<article>History has shown that the best way to predict a person’s behavior over the near-term future is to look at that person’s behavior in the recent past. It’s a concept similar to the First Rule of Physics — an object in motion tends to stay in motion.</p>
<p>We can apply this theory to consumer credit, too. A person who has recently paid his bills on-time should continue to pay his bills on-time in the near-future.</p>
<p>This is the basis of credit scoring; using your past to predict your future.</p>
<p>To mortgage lenders, your credit score represents your likelihood of making on-time mortgage payments for the next 90 days. “90 days” matters because, after 90 days without payments, a homeowner falls into default.</p>
<p>Higher credit scores correlate with lower default risk which explains why people with high credit scores tend to receive lower mortgage rates than people with low credit scores. This is true across all loan types, including conventional, jumbo, <a title="FHA Streamline Refinance guidelines and mortgage rates" href="http://themortgagereports.com/fha-current-guidelines" target="_blank">and FHA mortgages</a>.</p>
<p>Like most else in finance, those with the lowest risks get to pay the lowest rates.</p>
<h2>Lenders Use The FICO Scoring Model, Exclusively</h2>
<p>There are three main credit bureaus in the United States. They are Equifax, Experian and TransUnion. Each offers a bevy of credit-scoring products, available for purchase on their respective websites. Prices range from “free” to several hundred dollars.</p>
<p>None, however, are particularly relevant in the home-buying process. This is because the nation’s mortgage lenders rely on a different credit model — the FICO model.</p>
<p>FICO is named for the Fair Isaac Corporation. It was “invented” in the 1950s and has become the mortgage industry standard for credit ratings. Today, FICO scores are omnipresent to the point that people generically refer to <em>all</em> credit scores as “FICO scores”.</p>
<p>This is akin to calling all adhesive bandages “Band-Aids”. FICO is the brand name — not the product.</p>
<p>FICO scores range from 300-850.</p>
<h2>Credit Scores Change Mortgage Rates</h2>
<p>Your FICO score has always influenced the mortgage rate for which you’re eligible. In 2008, though, it began to change your loan fees.</p>
<p>In response to major mortgage market losses, in April 2008, both Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac introduced something called Loan-Level Pricing Adjustments (LLPA). Loan-level pricing adjustments are “discount points” added to a mortgage rate, based on a specific borrower’s risk to the lender.</p>
<p>A discount point is a loan fee, paid at the time of closing. 1 discount point is equal to 1 percent of your loan size.</p>
<p><strong>Example : A $300,000 mortgage that’s assessed 1 discount point will have $3,000 in extra fees due at closing.</strong></p>
<p>Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac know that low credit scores correlate to high default rates so, like an insurance policy, they assigned the highest costs to the highest-risk borrowers.</p>
<p>Assuming a 20% downpayment, look at how discount points change based on credit score. Fees get massive for FICOs under 700.</p>
<ul>
<li>740+ FICO  : There are no discount points required. This loan is “low risk”.</li>
<li>720-739 FICO :  0.250 discount points are charged to the borrower, or $250 per $100,000 borrowed</li>
<li>700-719 FICO :  0.750 discount points are charged to the borrower, or $750 per $100,000 borrowed</li>
<li>680-699 FICO :  1.500 discount points are charged to the borrower, or $1,500 per $100,000 borrowed</li>
<li>660-679 FICO :  2.500 discount points are charged to the borrower, or $2,500 per $100,000 borrowed</li>
</ul>
<p>Now, not many new home buyers just have that kind of extra cash just laying around. Therefore, as an alternative to paying discount points with cash, many choose to “roll up” the fees into their respective mortgage rates. In general, 1.000 discount point can be “traded in” for a 0.250 increase to your mortgage rate.</p>
<p><strong>Example : A consumer with a 680 FICO score is required to pay 1.500 discount points at closing, or can alternatively accept a mortgage rate increase of 0.375%.</strong></p>
<p>This is why it’s important to keep your credit score high. There are real dollar costs for having scores under 740.</p>
<h2>Improving On Your Credit Score</h2>
<p>If your credit score is not as high as you’d like, the good news is that you can take steps to raise it — sometimes without even changing your spending habits.</p>
</article>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://chuckjones.visualwebb.com/2011/10/31/better-mortgage-rates-start-with-better-fico-scores/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>3 Last-Minute Real Estate Regrets &#8211; and How to Combat Them</title>
		<link>http://chuckjones.visualwebb.com/2011/10/28/3-last-minute-real-estate-regrets-and-how-to-combat-them/</link>
		<comments>http://chuckjones.visualwebb.com/2011/10/28/3-last-minute-real-estate-regrets-and-how-to-combat-them/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2011 21:59:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chuck</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chuckjones.visualwebb.com/?p=215</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Any time you make a major commitment, financial decision or move to the next  step in your life, there’s a chance you’ll have regrets at the last  minute. Just as brides and grooms commonly experience cold feet before  they walk down the aisle, many a home buyer has found themselves sitting at the closing table, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h1></h1>
<div>
<div><a href="http://images.trulia.com/blogimg/9/6/f/8/382213_1319673946210_o.jpg"><img src="http://images.trulia.com/blogimg/9/6/f/8/382213_1319673946210_b.jpg" alt="" align="left" /></a>Any time you make a major commitment, financial decision or move to the next  step in your life, there’s a chance you’ll have regrets at the last  minute. Just as brides and grooms commonly experience cold feet before  they walk down the aisle, many a home buyer has found themselves sitting at the closing table, pen paralyzed over paper, mentally cataloging  their last-minute regrets.</p>
<p>The first step in dealing with last-minute regrets is to understand that  they are totally normal &#8211; even rational. The fact that you&#8217;re fixated on your deal, or that you&#8217;re scared you&#8217;ve made the wrong  decision is a sign that you are treating this transaction with the  gravitas it deserves.</p>
<p>If you are buying or selling a home, here are  three last minute regrets you might encounter, and some ways to rethink  and counteract them.</p>
<p>1. I left money on the table &#8211; could have gotten more (or paid less) for it. This regret showcases a classic case of buyer’s &#8211; and seller’s &#8211; remorse. The day an offer is signed, sometimes within moments after  acceptance, sellers second guess whether they might have been able to  get more cash if they’d negotiated harder, and buyers beat themselves up over not going in lower or holding out against the seller’s  counteroffers.</p>
<p>Conquer real estate remorse by understanding that the universe in which you pay or receive anything other than what you and the other side actually DID agree to is a hypothetical fantasyland. It doesn’t exist. Your decision made sense when you made it, and did actually result in a deal &#8211; unless you realize that the home does not actually suit your needs or you receive new information that changes your understanding of the  home’s value (i.e., later disclosures or inspection reports reveal  significant problems) within the time frame you have for resolving such  issues, a deal is a deal.</p>
<p>So stop torturing yourself and let it go. Be content with the fact that  you bought a home at or near the bottom of the market, or that you got  your home sold at a very tough time to do so, and turn your attention to the next phase.</p>
<p>2.  I’m overwhelmed by the 30-year mortgage commitment.  Thirty years seems like a long, long time. But here’s the rethink: you need to live somewhere forever, and I hope that your forever will last 30 years times three!  So, unless you have access to free housing somewhere,  here are your options:</p>
<ul>
<li>You can rent a home and pay rent to a landlord every month for the rest of your life, or</li>
<li>You can buy a home with cash, or</li>
<li>You can use mortgage financing to buy a home, and make payments on it over time.</li>
</ul>
<p>So, in fact, the commitment you make to paying on a 30-year mortgage, which you have the power to pay off entirely over time, is less onerous and  lengthy than the alternative: paying monthly rent ad infinitum. While  it’s true that your mortgage binds you to a particular property unless  and until you can sell it or otherwise move on, if you select your home  wisely you will (a) relish that stability and/or (b) select a home with  good prospects for resale in the long-term.  (If you think you’ll want  or need to move in less than a 7- to 10-year time frame, you might be  well-advised to continue renting rather than buying a home.)</p>
<p>The fact that you take out a 30-year mortgage (or a 15-year one, for that  matter) does not bind you to that time frame; many homeowners elect to  pay their mortgages off early. Putting a plan in place to shave off five or 10 years from your mortgage commitment by paying extra toward your  mortgage principal on a regular schedule is one way to control your  regret and put it to good use.</p>
<p>3. I can’t believe I went through all of my cash cushion!  In this relatively new mortgage era, lenders are requiring buyers to  put some of their own skin in the game, by requiring down payments in a  way they once did not. Beyond that, the vast majority of the down  payment assistance programs that once helped buyers meet these  requirements are now gone (state, local and employer-funded programs are the last bastions of down payment help). As a result, today’s buyers  frequently spend a couple of years saving up their cash, and optimizing  their credit creating strong financial habits and getting used to having a fluffy cash cushion along the way, then end up writing a couple of  checks &#8211; earnest money deposit, increased deposit and cash to close &#8211; that wipe nearly the whole thing out in 45 days or less.</p>
<p>And that can be traumatic. But if your spirits are feeling as deflated as  your savings account when you write those checks, keep in mind that you  are investing that money in a home that your family will be able to live and flourish in, and eventually either pay off or have equity in, if  you continue your responsible financial trajectory.  Additionally, this  is precisely the reason you saved the cash in the first place.</p>
<p>Finally, due to your timing vis-a-vis home prices and interest rates, you are  getting the most home-buying bang your hard-earned bucks could have  bought anytime in the last decade or so.  And that’s really something to be proud of &#8211; not to regret.</p></div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://chuckjones.visualwebb.com/2011/10/28/3-last-minute-real-estate-regrets-and-how-to-combat-them/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fixed Mortgage Rates Hold Steady</title>
		<link>http://chuckjones.visualwebb.com/2011/10/21/fixed-mortgage-rates-hold-steady/</link>
		<comments>http://chuckjones.visualwebb.com/2011/10/21/fixed-mortgage-rates-hold-steady/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2011 15:55:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chuck</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chuckjones.visualwebb.com/?p=207</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[MCLEAN, Va., &#8212; Freddie Mac (OTC: FMCC) today released the results of its Primary Mortgage Market Survey® (PMMS®), showing average mortgage rates relatively unchanged for the week amid mixed economic and consumer sentiment reports. Adjustable mortgage rates were mixed while fixed mortgage rates held steady remaining near their 60-year lows. 30-year fixed-rate mortgage (FRM) averaged [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>MCLEAN, Va., &#8212; Freddie Mac (OTC: FMCC) today released the results of its Primary Mortgage Market Survey® (PMMS®), showing average mortgage rates relatively unchanged for the week amid mixed economic and consumer sentiment reports. Adjustable mortgage rates were mixed while fixed mortgage rates held steady remaining near their 60-year lows.</div>
<div>
<p>30-year fixed-rate mortgage (FRM) averaged 4.11 percent with an average 0.8 point for the week ending October 20, 2011, down from last week when it averaged 4.12 percent. Last year at this time, the 30-year FRM averaged 4.21 percent.</p>
<p>15-year FRM this week averaged 3.38 percent with an average 0.8 point, up from last week when it averaged 3.37 percent. A year ago at this time, the 15-year FRM averaged 3.64 percent.</p>
<p>5-year Treasury-indexed hybrid adjustable-rate mortgage (ARM) averaged 3.01 percent this week, with an average 0.6 point, down from last week when it also averaged 3.06 percent. A year ago, the 5-year ARM averaged 3.45 percent.</p>
<p>1-year Treasury-indexed ARM averaged 2.94 percent this week with an average 0.6 point, up from last week when it averaged 2.90 percent. At this time last year, the 1-year ARM averaged 3.30 percent.</p>
<p>Frank Nothaft, vice president and chief economist at Freddie Mac, reports, &#8220;Mortgage rates remained relatively unchanged this week amid mixed economic data reports. Retail sales were up 1.1 percent in September, almost four times the pace set in August, but consumer sentiment was down in October, according to the Thomson Reuters/University of Michigan index. Finally, in its October 9th regional economic review, the Federal Reserve reported that overall economic activity continued to expand in September, but contacts noted weaker or less certain outlooks for business conditions.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;The home construction industry had some good news for a change. The National Association of Home Builders/Wells Fargo Housing Market Index jumped four points in October, the largest one-month gain since April 2010. Housing starts sprang up 15 percent in September, largely driven by a spike in multifamily starts to a level last seen in 2008. Building permits on 5-or-more unit buildings fell by 13 percent, however, suggesting that the multifamily building pickup may be temporary.&#8221;</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://chuckjones.visualwebb.com/2011/10/21/fixed-mortgage-rates-hold-steady/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

